Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 3:34:34 GMT
Ali stated that he wanted to stay with his father and that he was happy with his father. The main thing in regulating custody is the best interest of the child. When determining the best interest of the child; The aim of ensuring his/her physical, mental, spiritual, moral and social development must be observed. Within the scope of the file, there is no serious reason or evidence that the child's choice is against his or her best interests, in other words, that staying with the father would hinder the child's physical, intellectual and moral development.
Since nothing contrary to the best interests of the France Telegram Number Data child has been proven in granting custody to the father; Although the custody of the common child should be given to the father based on Ali's preference and best interest, making a decision in writing was against the procedure and the law and required reversal. Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber, 15.01.2019, 2018/7798 E., 2019/169 K. From the evidence in the file and that the defendant-plaintiff man applied for enforcement 5 times to establish a personal relationship with the joint child, when the woman
Came to the house where the woman lived with her family through enforcement, a personal relationship could not be established on the grounds that the child was not there, but in the social economic situation research and social investigation report in the file, it was revealed that the woman It is understood that the woman was determined to live with her family and a new address was not reported by the woman. In this way, it is understood that the mother abused her temporary custody duty by preventing the personal relationship between the father and the child.
Since nothing contrary to the best interests of the France Telegram Number Data child has been proven in granting custody to the father; Although the custody of the common child should be given to the father based on Ali's preference and best interest, making a decision in writing was against the procedure and the law and required reversal. Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber, 15.01.2019, 2018/7798 E., 2019/169 K. From the evidence in the file and that the defendant-plaintiff man applied for enforcement 5 times to establish a personal relationship with the joint child, when the woman
Came to the house where the woman lived with her family through enforcement, a personal relationship could not be established on the grounds that the child was not there, but in the social economic situation research and social investigation report in the file, it was revealed that the woman It is understood that the woman was determined to live with her family and a new address was not reported by the woman. In this way, it is understood that the mother abused her temporary custody duty by preventing the personal relationship between the father and the child.